May 22, 2013

Blog o’ the day: The Grammarphobia Blog

Every so often, we all run across one of those odd questions about our English language. You know, like what does the prefix “un” do to a word–intensify or negate? Or is it “sports’ report” or “sport’s report?” Maybe while at the water cooler you’ve asked your coworkers why duck sauce doesn’t have any duck in it.

If you’ve ever parsed words, phrases, or syntax, then The Grammarphobia Blog will be a fun treat for you. The product of Patricia T. O’Conner and Stewart Kellerman, who are both journalists, their format is to take questions from readers, do the research, and report back in an entertaining and interesting review of topic.

For example:

Q: A friend of mine (and I mean it) insists that “they/them/their” can be used in place of “he/she/him/her,” etc. For instance: “Has anyone lost their pit bull?” This sounds wrong to me. Can you help me persuade my friend that it’s wrong?

A: It sounds wrong to us too, though we’d be more concerned about that lost pit bull than about the questionable grammar.

Followed by a quick review of etymology, rules and usage in modern English. Here’s an excerpt from the answer to the above question.

Granted, “they/them/their” are third-person plural pronouns. But many, many people use them in a singular sense, especially in reference to unspecified or indefinite people (as in “If someone calls, tell them I’m out”).

Furthermore, this usage, while now considered a misusage, has some history on its side. We’ve written about this several times in the past, including in the New York Times Magazine.

It’s a great little blog, updated regularly, and always an interesting, educational, and entertaining read. Check it out, add it to your blog reader, and start learning a little more about your mother tongue.

No one wants to read law reviews…

The great thing about the legal blogs out there is that they make the law into something that law reviews and court rulings cannot – something interesting to read.

Here are a few of the blogs that I like to read from time to time, in no particular order:

  • Popehat: a random assortment of items, often about the law, often about whatever gripes the authors have on their minds.  It bills itself as “A GROUP COMPLAINT ABOUT LAW, LIBERTY, AND LEISURE.”  For example “Stay Classy, Nike” takes issue with Nike’s continued support for Tiger.
  • Simple Justice: is the blog of a New York criminal defense attorney… or at least about criminal defense.  Interesting post, on occasion, such as “Promise Unkept” about lawyers being behind the times on technology, or “Prosecutor as a social engineer” about the enforcement of sex education laws in Wisconsin.
  • Above the Law: it covers news from across the spectrum, but especially news from the big firms and law schools.  One notable post I read recently is “What’s your brand?
  • Lowering the Bar: it’s all about what’s funny about the law, and usually features the laughable that comes out of court and those who practice there.  Recently they noted that Kazakhstan is looking for a new dean for its law school (did you even know it had a law school?).

Enjoy!

A Blog You Should Read: The Volokh Conspiracy

Quickly, because it is Friday and my brain also feels like it’s ready to explode, I want to throw in a plug for one of my favorite blogs, the Volokh Conspiracy.  To be sure, I don’t know a ton about any of the contributors, other than their names and that they are largely comprised of law professors.  The blog is always  active, and the comments are almost as enlightening and interesting a discussion as the original posts themselves (if not sometimes more so).  The range of interests cross the spectrum from legal to political to society and even sports…pretty much whatever the writers are thinking about.

So, if you haven’t checked in their yet, find some time to do it this weekend.