May 25, 2013

Snooki, Kim Kardashian, sex, and intellect in America: what separates us from the animals.

Few things in America embarrass me more than Snooki and Kim Kardashian. Since I think we can agree that Kardashian is at least a clever devil, a capitalist even, then that leaves just Snooki.

She’s not even clever.

And I’ve never even watched her show, “Jersey Shore.”

Recently she sat down with GQ to show what and how she thinks (I know…I just used that word in reference to Snooki), and I almost felt dumber for reading just an excerpt of the interview.

From Matt, at Warming Glow:

Ahhhh, nothing makes me feel like intellectual pursuits are a complete waste quite like Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi speaking straight from the heart. This time, the New York Times bestselling author sat down with GQ and shared her views about reading, politics, how she’d change “Jersey Shore,” and absolutely nothing that will make you feel good about the state of the nation.

Yep. The state of the nation. I can empathize with that. Especially when other writers are questioning what Kim Kardashian’s business transaction, er, I mean, wedding and subsequent divorce, mean for the institution of marriage. Wrote Reem Nasr for Policy Mic:

Pop culture’s obsession with weddings is clear. The attention and emphasis is on how to throw the most fabulous wedding and less on how to make a marriage last a lifetime. The shift is moving from a focus on marriage to one on weddings. So while we are less interested in the mechanics of sustaining a long-term relationship with someone else, we are blindsighted by the chance to plan an extravagant event that everyone can remember even if the marriage does not last. It is interesting to see that the wedding industry is booming as more and more marriages are breaking. The Pew survey tells us that marriage is less important to young people today, but American culture is still fascinated by a lavish wedding.

Kardashian may have missed the mark this time around, but we can be sure to expect another wedding spectacular in her near future.

Well, said, Reem…but back to Snooki and the tidbits of wisdom she imparts to Mark Green at GQ.

GQ: So, I’ve got to ask: You’ve really never heard of J.K. Rowling or Maya Angelou?
Snooki: I don’t read. I don’t like to read Harry Potter or anything like that. It’s not my style.

GQ: But you’re a New York Times best-selling author!
Snooki: Yeah, doesn’t mean I have to read.

GQ: Fair point. What is your favorite book?
Snooki:Dear John. I read that in a day because it was so amazing. And then I ended up seeing the movie and it was really good. We were supposed to read in high school but I never did because I just used the CliffsNotes, books were too long.

What? No shout out for Twilight?! But wait! There’s more!

GQ: What do you think people’s perception is of you guys?
Snooki: They just think that we’re stupid, that we have no education, and all we do is drink, have sex.

GQ: Do you want to change that?
Snooki: Oh, I would love to. I have an education, I went to college, you know?

Obviously we did not know, and obviously whatever college that was no longer claims you as their student.

But wow. Just wow.

I can’t help but recall a few lines from Harold Bloom’s “Closing of the American Mind” on the decline of intellectualism in America. Sex is not the end of man’s nature, though Snooki may act it and Kardashian may use it in her transactions. Indeed, it is only the beginning, and their use of sex not only trivializes it in our society and culture, but diminishes its role and how it separates us from animals. Writes Bloom:

In all species other than man, when an animal reaches puberty, it is all that it will ever be. This stage is the clear end toward which all of its growth and learning is directed. The animal’s activity is reproduction. It lives on this plateau until it starts downhill. Only in man is puberty just the beginning. The greater and more interesting part of his learning, moral and intellectual, comes afterward, and in civilized man is incorporated into his erotic desire. His taste and hence his choices are determined during this “sentimental education.” It is as though his learning were for the sake of his sexuality. Reciprocally, though, much of the energy for that learning obviously comes from his sexuality. Nobody takes human children who have reached puberty to be adults. We properly sense that there is a long road to adulthood, the condition in which they are able to govern themselves and be true mothers and fathers. This road is the serious part of education, where animal sexuality becomes human sexuality, where instinct gives way in man to choice with regard to the true, the good, and the beautiful. Puberty does not provide man, as it does other animals, with all that he needs to leave behind others of his kind. This means that the animal part of his sexuality is intertwined in the most complex way with the higher reaches of his soul, which must inform the desires with its insight . . .

Or sex and the sexual can be just one more means to an end: entertainment or closing of a business transaction.

Do America a favor: turn-off Snooki and turn off the Kardashians. We don’t all need to be the intellectual equivalent of Oliver Wendell Holmes, but a step higher than the “cliff-notes only” attitudes of Snooki and her coterie might not hurt. Indeed, it may be just one more thing that stops America’s competitive slide in the world.

[Warming Glow][GQ]

Recursion: that sound is my brain popping

 

Yeah. Fun. Get it?

And that is why I went to law school…

[Volokh Conspiracy]

Facebook changes: To complain or not to complain.

Unless you have been hiding under a rock, you have noticed that your Facebook experience just got worse. Also, you probably just found out that Geico can save you  money on car insurance, but that is another subject for another time.

Facebook has come out with some major changes to the behemoth social networking site. The change has been met with the wrath and disgruntlement of thousands, as well as validating the surging Google+.

But mostly, I’ve just heard people say they don’t like it.  Common complaints I’ve heard are 1) People don’t like the new layout. 2) Many dislike the distracting and over-sharey “ticker.” 3)Most users aren’t too happy with how Facebook determines the “top stories”, and 4) Most seem to think the new feature which makes it so you can see when someone de-friends you takes “Facebook stalking” to a whole new level.

Customer satisfaction? The only thing in my my news feed are more complaints:

  • “Really disliking the new Facebook…”
  • “Why fix something if it’s not broken? I hate the new Facebook ”
  • “Trying to get used to this new layout. I wish Facebook would stop changing things.”
  • “What the #$^@ is up with that ticker in the upper right? Do I really need to know THAT much about everyone?”

Invariably, new Facebook groups are formed–like the cleverly named“I hate the new Facebook” group, which currently has close to 20,000 members.

This is all followed by people debating whether users should or shouldn’t  complain about changes like these, spawning posts like “if you don’t like it, just delete your profile. It’s free, no one is making you use it.”

And this is the question: Do people have a right to complain when something is free? (Or do people have the right to complain about other people complaining? But that discussion might mess with the space-time continuum.)

After all, Facebook is free, right? Is it in poor taste to complain when something is offered to you gratis?  The internet delivers content and services free of charge, which has revolutionized our lives and how we communicate–but it has also created a culture of “keyboard courage,” entitlement, and trolling. People expect things to be free and are irritated when they get anything short of the convenient user-experience we expect. (I’m guilty of this, as banner ads and auto-play videos on news sites frequently annoy me.)

Knowing full well that there are far more important issues to discuss, I am instead going to provide two sides to the argument–the “anti-complain” argument, which says that  you shouldn’t complain about new features of a free site, and the “pro-complain” camp–which argues that you have every right to complain.

Anti-Complain

Quit your belly aching!

If it is so bad, delete your account and go to Google+. Tell everyone you know who isn’t on Facebook how terrible Facebook is (if you know anyone who isn’t on Facebook, because let’s be honest–if they aren’t, do they really exist?).

Besides, it is free. How would you feel if you decided to host a party for your neighborhood, invited everyone over, gave them refreshments, provided entertainment, only to hear endless complaints about the food and music?

And if you are bugged by the increasingly complicated privacy settings, and how frequently you have to update them, what were you expecting? Facebook is a massive corporation, with database full of extremely valuable consumer preferences. Did you really expect them not to do anything to profit from it?

Pro-Complain

Sure, Facebook users aren’t paying for Facebook usage. At least not monetarily (and won’t ever, contrary to the countless recent posts of Facebook’s rumored secret plot to start charging for membership–see their own fan page, where they address this rumor).

But that doesn’t mean we aren’t paying. We are paying Facebook by freely giving up our key demographic information,  our “likes” and “dislikes,” our time, our networks, and our opinions. Facebook profits by selling advertising space to companies who  market to people who have precisely those “likes” and “dislikes” and that exact demographic information. So we have every right to express our complaints as paying customers.

Besides, if I go into a restaurant or clothing store, and leave because I’m treated rudely, don’t I  have a right to complain–because I wasn’t treated right? Of course.  I have “the right” to complain. Just because I didn’t spend money, I was still a patron.

In conclusion, Facebook has caused fascinating cultural and societal changes. Human interactions involving relationship building, marketing, communication, or the simple act of getting to know someone have all been dramatically changed by Facebook.  People are addicted to Facebook and spend more time there than any other site–so it’s only natural that they would cling to something  that they are comfortable with.

As for my opinion, I am leaning far more towards the “if you don’t like it, delete your account and go to Google+” camp.  Then again, this isn’t the first change, and it won’t be the last. Perhaps whining is just perpetually part of the experience.


_______________________________________________________________________________________
Craig Christensen is a guest writer on Publius Online. For more of Craig’s thoughts on culture, politics, sports, and nonsense, follow him on Twitter: @CraigDChris

The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming…

Remember Red Dawn? You know: height of the Cold War, the Russians attack, and a bunch of teenagers fight back? (or something vaguely like that).

The Russians have a better idea for taking over North America, and no one’s going to get shot in the process.

Russia has unveiled an ambitious plan to build the world’s longest tunnel under the Bering Strait as part of a transport corridor linking Europe and America via Siberia and Alaska.

The 64-mile (103km) tunnel would connect the far east of Russia with Alaska, opening up the prospect of the ultimate rail trip across three quarters of the globe from London to New York. The link would be twice as long as the Channel Tunnel connecting Britain and France.

The $65 billion (£33 billion) mega-project aims to transform trade links between Russia and its former Cold War enemies across some of the world’s most desolate terrain. It would create a high-speed railway line, energy links and a fibreoptic cable network

Why not? I’ve always wanted to see Siberia. Road trip anyone? In 2021?

Oh, also, I’ve got a bridge for sale, in Brooklyn, if you want to buy some shares…

[via Times of London]

Enhanced by Zemanta

Space shuttle Atlantis returns from its last trip

Space shuttle Atlantis lands at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla., Thursday, July 21, 2011. The landing of Atlantis brings the space shuttle program to an end. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

I’d be dishonest if I didn’t admit that a poster of the space shuttle graced my wall for many a year while I was growing up. I’m sad that the era is ending, but I hope it will not mean the end of space exploration.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Little did he know…