August 11, 2026

TANSTAAFL: Obamacare turns three and the costs continue to tally [Infographic]

This week in TANSTAAFL news: it’s  Obamacare‘s third anniversary, and, as then Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously said, we had to pass it to find out what’s in it. We’re still trying to find out what’s in it. Today, for your pleasure, a small infographic on the costs that have come with the ironically named Affordable Care […]

Is the union stronger? [Contributor]

President Obama’s State of the Union address was in trouble hardly after it began when he said that “we can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is stronger.” Economically, that’s hardly believable, with a $16.5 trillion national debt and annual budget deficit topping $1 trillion for the fourth consecutive year. Neither […]

The Obamacare saga encourages political dishonesty [Contributor]

Political dissemblance over the nature of taxes and regulatory architecture looms as an inevitably dark truth of post-Obamacare government. Through the tortuous legislative course of Obamacare’s genesis, Democrats continually denied that the individual mandate was a tax, the heaviest word in America’s political lexicon. Instead, the mandate was a “penalty,” or a “shared responsibility payment.” (A chillingly Orwellian turn-of-phrase). The Democrats knew that truth in taxation would slay Obamacare and scuttle their century-long obsession with state-directed flu shots and hip replacements. So they prevaricated. What do congressmen call a law that amends the Internal Revenue Code, is enforced by the Internal Revenue Service, and forces families to pay up to 2.5% of their incomes into the federal treasury? Anything but a tax.

Unless you’re in court—there, any word will do. [cont…]

The “individual mandate” is a “tax.” Voters are not noticeably relieved.

The government devoted 21 lines of its brief to argue that § 5000A was a tax, and it’s longest statement on the issue at oral arguments was 50 words.

Huffington Predicts the Demise of Obamacare

[h/t Aaron Bludworth]                  

Obamacare Proponents Brace for Supreme Court Smackdown

In the days leading up to the Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of President’s Obama’s signature health care law, there was no end to the media speculation about which conservative leaning justice(s) would leave the dark-side and vote to uphold Obamacare. We were treated to a barrage of statistics touting the popularity of Obamacare, reminders that Republicans had supported mandates in the past and other specious arguments that have no bearing on the constitutionality of the law. Self-assured Progressives, it seemed, had little concern that socialized medicine was in any danger. [cont…]

Our Healthcare System: Could Reforming Medicaid Free Up Money For Education?

Just because conservatives, myself included, believe (quite rightly) that the individual mandate portion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is completely outside of the scope of what Congress is constitutionally permitted to regulate, it doesn’t mean that we also believe that nothing should be done to improve our health care system.

Indeed, what was once the best healthcare in the world has become expensive, byzantine, and difficult to understand. We could argue about the reasons–repeated government interventions in the healthcare market going back several decades, the rising cost of living, an exploding Baby Boomer generation, longer life spans, and so on–but the reality is: it’s more expensive, and it’s hurting all of us, especially those on the lower end of the economic spectrum.

We’ve all had the experience of dealing with the logothetes of one insurance company or another, of hospitals, or Medicaid and Medicare administration. It’s almost never easy to find an answer, and it’s a daunting and intimidating process. [cont…]